Advertisement
Advances in Clinical Radiology

Transradial Access in Interventional Radiology

      Transradial arterial access is comparable with transfemoral access in terms of safety and technical success and is preferred by patients, allowing more mobility in the recovery period.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Advances in Clinical Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Campeau L.
        Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.
        Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989; 16: 3-7
        • Kiemeneij F.
        • Laarman G.J.
        Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation.
        Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993; 30: 173-178
        • Valgimigli M.
        • Frigoli E.
        • Leonardi S.
        • et al.
        Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2018; 392: 835-848
        • Chase A.J.
        • Fretz E.B.
        • Warburton W.P.
        • et al.
        Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg).
        Heart. 2008; 94: 1019-1025
        • Jolly S.S.
        • Yusuf S.
        • Cairns J.
        • et al.
        Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.
        Lancet. 2011; 377: 1409-1420
        • Frangosa C.
        • Nobleb S.
        How to transform you into a radialist: literature review.
        Cardiovasc Med. 2011; 14: 277-282
        • Fischman A.M.
        • Swinburne N.C.
        • Patel R.S.
        A Technical Guide Describing the Use of Transradial Access Technique for Endovascular Interventions.
        Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015; 18: 58-65
        • Barbeau G.R.
        • Arsenault F.
        • Dugas L.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allen’s test in 1010 patients.
        Am Heart J. 2004; 147: 489-493
        • Yoo B.-S.
        • Yoon J.
        • Ko J.-Y.
        • et al.
        Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity.
        Int J Cardiol. 2005; 101: 421-427
        • Lo T.S.
        • Nolan J.
        • Fountzopoulos E.
        • et al.
        Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome.
        Heart. 2009; 95: 410-415
        • Yokoyama N.
        • Takeshita S.
        • Ochiai M.
        • et al.
        Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention.
        Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000; 49: 357-362
        • Barbeau G.R.
        Radial loop and extreme vessel tortuosity in the transradial approach: Advantage of hydrophilic-coated guidewires and catheters.
        Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003; 59 (Available at:): 442-450
        • Posham R.
        • Biederman D.M.
        • Patel R.S.
        • et al.
        Transradial approach for noncoronary interventions: a single-center review of safety and feasibility in the first 1,500 cases.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016; 27: 159-166
        • Chen Y.-Y.
        • Liu P.
        • Wu Y.-S.
        • et al.
        Transradial vs transfemoral access in patients with hepatic malignancy and undergoing hepatic interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Medicine. 2018; 97: e13926
        • Nakhaei M.
        • Mojtahedi A.
        • Faintuch S.
        • et al.
        Transradial and transfemoral uterine fibroid embolization comparative study: technical and clinical outcomes.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2019.08.016
        • Wu T.
        • Sun R.
        • Huang Y.
        • et al.
        Transradial arterial chemoembolization reduces complications and costs in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
        Indian J Cancer. 2015; 52: e107-e111
        • Shiozawa S.
        • Tsuchiya A.
        • Endo S.
        • et al.
        Transradial approach for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with conventional transfemoral approach.
        J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003; 37: 412
        • Iezzi R.
        • Pompili M.
        • Posa A.
        • et al.
        Transradial versus transfemoral access for hepatic chemoembolization: intrapatient prospective single-center study.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28: 1234-1239
        • Gjoreski A.
        • Gjoreski J.
        • Nancheva A.
        Uterine fibroid embolization via transradial versus transfemoral arterial access: technical results.
        Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7: 579-582
        • Roy A.K.
        • Garot P.
        • Louvard Y.
        • et al.
        Comparison of transradial vs transfemoral access for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions: a single-center experience.
        J Endovasc Ther. 2016; 23: 880-888
        • Bhatia S.
        • Harward S.H.
        • Sinha V.K.
        • et al.
        Prostate artery embolization via transradial or transulnar versus transfemoral arterial access: technical results.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28: 898-905
        • Kis B.
        • Mills M.
        • Hoffe S.E.
        Hepatic radioembolization from transradial access: initial experience and comparison to transfemoral access.
        Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016; 22: 444-449
        • Cortese B.
        • Peretti E.
        • Troisi N.
        • et al.
        Transradial percutaneous iliac intervention, a feasible alternative to the transfemoral route.
        Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012; 13: 331-334
        • van Dijk L.J.D.
        • van Noord D.
        • van Mierlo M.
        • et al.
        Single-center retrospective comparative analysis of transradial, transbrachial, and transfemoral approach for mesenteric arterial procedures.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2019.08.026
        • Mortensen C.
        • Chung J.
        • Liu D.
        • et al.
        Prospective study on total fluoroscopic time in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization: comparing transradial and transfemoral approaches.
        Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019; 42: 441-447
        • Stern J.R.
        • Elmously A.
        • Smith M.C.
        • et al.
        Transradial interventions in contemporary vascular surgery practice.
        Vascular. 2019; 27: 110-116
        • Isaacson A.J.
        • Fischman A.M.
        • Burke C.T.
        Technical feasibility of prostatic artery embolization from a transradial approach.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 206: 442-444
        • Resnick N.J.
        • Kim E.
        • Patel R.S.
        • et al.
        Uterine artery embolization using a transradial approach: initial experience and technique.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014; 25: 443-447
        • Basile A.
        • Rebonato A.
        • Failla G.
        • et al.
        Early post-procedural patients compliance and VAS after UAE through transradial versus transfemoral approach: preliminary results.
        Radiol Med. 2018; 123: 885-889
        • Thakor A.S.
        • Alshammari M.T.
        • Liu D.M.
        • et al.
        Transradial access for interventional radiology: single-centre procedural and clinical outcome analysis.
        Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017; 68: 318-327
        • Liu L.B.
        • Cedillo M.A.
        • Bishay V.
        • et al.
        Patient experience and preference in transradial versus transfemoral access during transarterial radioembolization: a randomized single-center trial.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 30: 414-420
        • Yamada R.
        • Bracewell S.
        • Bassaco B.
        • et al.
        Transradial versus transfemoral arterial access in liver cancer embolization: randomized trial to assess patient satisfaction.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018; 29: 38-43
        • Cooper C.J.
        • El-Shiekh R.A.
        • Cohen D.J.
        • et al.
        Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison.
        Am Heart J. 1999; 138: 430-436
        • Mitchell M.D.
        • Hong J.A.
        • Lee B.Y.
        • et al.
        Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5: 454-462
        • Srinivasa R.N.
        • Chick J.F.B.
        • Gemmete J.J.
        • et al.
        Prone transradial catheterization for combined single-session endovascular and percutaneous interventions: approach, technical success, safety, and outcomes in 15 patients.
        Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018; 24: 276-282
        • Hess C.N.
        • Peterson E.D.
        • Neely M.L.
        • et al.
        The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
        Circulation. 2014; 129: 2277-2286
        • Iezzi R.
        • Posa A.
        • Merlino B.
        • et al.
        Operator learning curve for transradial liver cancer embolization: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program.
        Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019; 25: 368-374
        • Jolly S.S.
        • Cairns J.
        • Niemela K.
        • et al.
        Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6: 258-266
        • Becher T.
        • Behnes M.
        • Ünsal M.
        • et al.
        Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
        Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016; 17: 505-509
        • Biancari F.
        • D’Andrea V.
        • Di Marco C.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty.
        Am Heart J. 2010; 159: 518-531
        • Kotowycz M.A.
        • Dzavík V.
        Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 127-133
        • Rashid M.
        • Kwok C.S.
        • Pancholy S.
        • et al.
        Radial artery occlusion after transradial interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002686
        • Avdikos G.
        • Karatasakis A.
        • Tsoumeleas A.
        • et al.
        Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization.
        Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017; 7: 305-316
        • Ratib K.
        • Mamas M.A.
        • Routledge H.C.
        • et al.
        Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention.
        Am Heart J. 2013; 165: 317-324
        • Bendszus M.
        • Stoll G.
        Silent cerebral ischaemia: hidden fingerprints of invasive medical procedures.
        Lancet Neurol. 2006; 5: 364-372
        • Jurga J.
        • Nyman J.
        • Tornvall P.
        • et al.
        Cerebral microembolism during coronary angiography: a randomized comparison between femoral and radial arterial access.
        Stroke. 2011; 42: 1475-1477
        • Hamon M.
        • Baron J.-C.
        • Viader F.
        • et al.
        Periprocedural stroke and cardiac catheterization.
        Circulation. 2008; 118: 678-683
        • Dukkipati S.
        • O’Neill W.W.
        • Harjai K.J.
        • et al.
        Characteristics of cerebrovascular accidents after percutaneous coronary interventions.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 1161-1167
        • Patel V.G.
        • Brayton K.M.
        • Kumbhani D.J.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of stroke after transradial versus transfemoral artery catheterization.
        Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168: 5234-5238
        • Valgimigli M.
        • Gagnor A.
        • Calabró P.
        • et al.
        Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 2465-2476
        • Alnasser S.M.
        • Bagai A.
        • Jolly S.S.
        • et al.
        Transradial approach for coronary angiography and intervention in the elderly: A meta-analysis of 777,841 patients.
        Int J Cardiol. 2017; 228: 45-51
        • Meertens M.M.
        • Ng E.
        • Loh S.E.K.
        • et al.
        Transradial approach for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Endovasc Ther. 2018; 25: 599-607
        • Posham R.
        • Young L.B.
        • Lookstein R.A.
        • et al.
        Radial access for lower extremity peripheral arterial interventions: do we have the tools?.
        Semin Intervent Radiol. 2018; 35: 427-434
        • Mwipatayi B.P.
        • Thomas S.
        • Wong J.
        • et al.
        A comparison of covered vs bare expandable stents for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease.
        J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54: 1561-1570
        • Trani C.
        • Tommasino A.
        • Burzotta F.
        Pushing the limits forward: transradial superficial femoral artery stenting.
        Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 76: 1065-1071
        • Lorenzoni R.
        • Lisi C.
        • Lorenzoni G.
        • et al.
        Endovascular treatment of iliac and common femoral arteries disease by the transradial access: A prospective, feasibility study.
        Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018; 19: 314-318
        • Fanaroff A.C.
        • Rao S.V.
        • Swaminathan R.V.
        Radial access for peripheral interventions.
        Interv Cardiol Clin. 2020; 9: 53-61
        • Soydan E.
        • Akın M.
        Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach - An alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography.
        Anatol J Cardiol. 2018; 19: 243-248
        • Davies R.E.
        • Gilchrist I.C.
        Back hand approach to radial access: The snuff box approach.
        Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018; 19: 324-326
        • Kiemeneij F.
        Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI).
        EuroIntervention. 2017; 13: 851-857
        • Sgueglia G.A.
        • Di Giorgio A.
        • Gaspardone A.
        • et al.
        Anatomic basis and physiological rationale of distal radial artery access for percutaneous coronary and endovascular procedures.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11: 2113-2119
        • Al-Azizi K.M.
        • Lotfi A.S.
        The distal left radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention: A new era.
        Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018; 19: 35-40
        • Pua U.
        • Sim J.Z.T.
        • Quek L.H.H.
        • et al.
        Feasibility study of “snuffbox” radial access for visceral interventions.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018; 29: 1276-1280
        • Boncoraglio A.
        • Caltabiano G.
        • Foti P.V.
        • et al.
        Distal radial artery: The last extreme rescue arterial access for interventional radiologists?.
        SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2019; 7 (2050313X18823918)
        • van Dam L.
        • Geeraedts T.
        • Bijdevaate D.
        • et al.
        Distal radial artery access for noncoronary endovascular treatment is a safe and feasible technique.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 30: 1281-1285
        • Matsumoto T.
        • Hasebe T.
        • Kamei S.
        • et al.
        Snuff box radial access in transcatheter arterial embolization for unruptured renal angiomyolipoma.
        Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019; : 1-6https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1665549