Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 1, P233-241, September 2019

Vertebral Augmentation

  • Nicole S. Carter
    Affiliations
    Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    NeuroInterventional Radiology, Monash Imaging, Level 2 Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168, Australia

    Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Julian Maingard
    Affiliations
    NeuroInterventional Radiology, Monash Imaging, Level 2 Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168, Australia

    Interventional Neuroradiology, Radiology Department, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    School of Medicine – Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ronil V. Chandra
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. NeuroInterventional Radiology, Monash Imaging, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
    Affiliations
    Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    NeuroInterventional Radiology, Monash Imaging, Level 2 Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present address: 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia.
    Hamed Asadi
    Footnotes
    1 Present address: 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia.
    Affiliations
    NeuroInterventional Radiology, Monash Imaging, Level 2 Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168, Australia

    Interventional Neuroradiology, Radiology Department, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    School of Medicine – Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Joshua A. Hirsch
    Affiliations
    Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MGH 55 Fruit Street, GRB 241, Boston, MA 02114, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present address: 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia.
      Vertebral augmentation is a minimally invasive, image-guided procedure that involves the insertion of bone cement into the fractured vertebral body. It is a treatment option for vertebral compression fractures that cause severe pain despite medical management.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Advances in Clinical Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ensrud K.E.
        • Schousboe J.T.
        Clinical practice. Vertebral fractures.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 1634-1642
        • Caudana R.
        • Renzi Brivio L.
        • Ventura L.
        • et al.
        CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: personal experience in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures and dorsolumbar metastases.
        Radiol Med. 2008; 113: 114-133
        • Vogl T.J.
        • Proschek D.
        • Schwarz W.
        • et al.
        CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty in the therapy of vertebral compression fractures.
        Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 797-803
        • O’Brien J.P.
        • Sims J.T.
        • Evans A.J.
        Vertebroplasty in patients with severe vertebral compression fractures: a technical report.
        AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21: 1555-1558
        • Guglielmi G.
        • Andreula C.
        • Muto M.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, contraindications, technique, and complications.
        Acta Radiol. 2005; 46: 256-268
        • Nussbaum D.A.
        • Gailloud P.
        • Murphy K.
        A review of complications associated with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty as reported to the Food and Drug Administration medical device related web site.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004; 15: 1185-1192
        • Zoarski G.H.
        • Snow P.
        • Olan W.J.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002; 13: 139-148
        • Mathis J.M.
        • Barr J.D.
        • Belkoff S.M.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures.
        AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001; 22: 373-381
        • Jensen M.E.
        • McGraw J.K.
        • Cardella J.F.
        • et al.
        Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007; 18: 325-330
        • Voormolen M.H.
        • Mali W.P.
        • Lohle P.N.M.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with optimal pain medication treatment.
        AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28: 555-560
        • Kallmes D.F.
        • Comstock B.A.
        • Heagerty P.J.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 557-568
        • Buchbinder R.
        • Osborne R.H.
        • Ebeling P.R.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 557-568
        • Comstock B.A.
        • Sitlani C.M.
        • Jarvik J.G.
        • et al.
        Investigational vertebroplasty safety and efficacy trial (INVEST): patient-ported outcomes through 1 year.
        Radiology. 2013; 269: 224-231
        • Shi M.M.
        • Cai X.Z.
        • Lin T.
        • et al.
        Is there really no benefit of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures? A meta-analysis.
        Clin Orthop Relat Red. 2012; 470: 2785-2799
        • Klazen C.A.
        • Lohle P.N.
        • De Vries J.
        • et al.
        Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2010; 376: 1085-1092
        • Farrokhi M.R.
        • Alibai E.
        • Maghami Z.
        Randomized controlled trial of percutaneous vertebroplasty versus optimal medical management for the relief of pain and disability in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14: 561-569
        • Blasco J.
        • Martinez-Ferrer A.
        • Macho J.
        • et al.
        Effect of vertebroplasty on pain relief, quality of life and the incidence of new vertebral fractures: a 12-month randomized follow-up, controlled trial.
        J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27: 1159-1166
        • Clark W.
        • Bird P.
        • Gonski P.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2016; 388: 1408-1416
        • Hirsch J.A.
        • Chandra R.V.
        Resurrection of evidence for vertebroplasty?.
        Lancet. 2016; 388: 1356-1357
        • Yang E.Z.
        • Xu J.G.
        • Huang G.Z.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in aged patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41: 653-660
        • Firanescu C.E.
        • de Vries J.
        • Lodder P.
        • et al.
        Vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS IV): randomised sham controlled clinical trial.
        BMJ. 2018; 361 ([Erratum in: BMJ 2018;362:k2937]): k1551
        • Wardlaw D.
        • Cummings S.R.
        • Van Meirhaeghe J.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2009; 373: 1016-1024
        • Berenson J.
        • Pflugmacher R.
        • Jarzem P.
        • et al.
        Balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures in patients with cancer: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12: 225-235
        • Beall D.P.
        • Chambers M.R.
        • Thomas S.
        • et al.
        Prospective and multicenter evaluation of outcomes for quality of life and activities of daily living for balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: the EVOLVE trial.
        Neurosurgery. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy017
        • Bastian L.
        • Schils F.
        • Tillman J.B.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial comparing 2 techniques of balloon kyphoplasty and curette use for obtaining vertebral body height restoration and angular deformity correction in vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis.
        AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013; 34: 666-675
        • Dohm M.
        • Black C.M.
        • Dacre A.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial comparing balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis.
        AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014; 35: 2227-2236
        • Liu J.T.
        • Liao W.J.
        • Tan W.C.
        • et al.
        Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative and randomized clinical study.
        Osteoporos Int. 2010; 21: 359-364
        • Röllinghoff M.
        • Siewe J.
        • Zarghooni K.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness, security and height restoration on fresh compression fractures: a comparative prospective study of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.
        Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2009; 52: 233-237
        • McGraw J.K.
        • Cardella J.
        • Barr J.D.
        • et al.
        Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14: 311-315
        • Chandra R.V.
        • Yoo A.J.
        • Hirsch J.A.
        Vertebral augmentation: update on safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and increased survival.
        Pain Physician. 2013; 16: 309-320
        • Lieberman I.H.
        • Dudeney S.
        • Reinhardt M.K.
        • et al.
        Initial outcome and efficacy of ‘kyphoplasty’ in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
        Spine. 2001; 26: 1631-1637
        • Trumm C.G.
        • Pahl A.
        • Helmberger T.K.
        • et al.
        CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty in spinal malignancy: technical results, PMMA leakages, and complications in 202 patients.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41: 1391-1400
        • Uppin A.A.
        • Hirsch J.A.
        • Centenera L.V.
        • et al.
        Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis.
        Radiology. 2003; 226: 119-124
        • Zhang H.
        • Xu C.
        • Zhang T.
        • et al.
        Does percutaneous vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures increase the incidence of new vertebral fractures? A meta-analysis.
        Pain Physician. 2017; 20: 13-28
        • Papanastassiou I.D.
        • Phillips F.M.
        • Van Meirhaeghe J.
        • et al.
        Comparing effects of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and nonsurgical management in a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled studies.
        Eur Spine J. 2012; 21: 1826-1843
        • Luo J.
        • Annesley-Williams D.J.
        • Adams M.A.
        • et al.
        How are adjacent spinal levels affected by vertebral fracture and by vertebroplasty? A biomechanical study on cadaveric spines.
        Spine. 2017; 17: 863-874
        • Eichler M.C.
        • Spross C.
        • Ewers A.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic adjacent-segment vertebroplasty following kyphoplasty for a single osteoporotic vertebral fracture and the risk of adjacent fractures: a retrospective study and clinical experience.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 25: 528-534
        • Sattui S.E.
        • Saag K.G.
        Fracture mortality: associations with epidemiology and osteoporosis treatment.
        Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014; 10: 592-602
        • Ong K.L.
        • Beall D.P.
        • Frohbergh M.
        • et al.
        Were VCF patients at higher risk of mortality following the 2009 publication of the vertebroplasty ‘sham’ trials?.
        Osteoporos Int. 2018; 29: 375-383
        • Edidin A.A.
        • Ong K.L.
        • Lau E.
        • et al.
        Mortality risk for operated and non-operated vertebral fracture patients in the Medicare population.
        J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26: 1617-1626
        • Edidin A.A.
        • Ong K.L.
        • Lau E.
        • et al.
        Morbidity and mortality after vertebral fractures: comparison of vertebral augmentation and nonoperative management in the Medicare population.
        Spine. 2015; 40: 128-141
        • McCullough B.J.
        • Comstock B.A.
        • Deyo R.A.
        • et al.
        Major medical outcomes with spinal augmentation vs conservative therapy.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173: 1514-1521