Mammography has been well established through randomized controlled trials in the
1980s and 1990s to decrease breast cancer mortality. However, these trials accumulated
data from patients imaged with analog imaging, one of the very earliest mammography
techniques.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Advances in Clinical RadiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 45-51
- Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care.Eur J Public Health. 2012; 22: 925-929
- The incidence of fatal breast cancer measures the increased effectiveness of therapy in women participating in mammography screening.Cancer. 2018; 125: 515-523
- Breast cancer screening for average-risk women: recommendations from the ACR commission on breast imaging.J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 1137-1143
- Factors associated with adherence to mammography screening among insured women differ by income levels.Womens Health Issues. 2018; 28: 462-469
- Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction, and prevention.BMJ. 1992; 305: 443-445
- Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging.Int J Womens Health. 2017; 9: 359-364
- Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure- and force-standardization.Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84: 384-391
- Affordable care act and disparities in health services utilization among ethnic minority breast cancer survivors: evidence from longitudinal medical expenditure panel surveys 2008-2015.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15 ([pii:E1860])
- Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study.Radiology. 2003; 229: 877-884
- Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II study.Radiology. 2004; 232: 197-204
- Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 1773-1783
- Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.Radiology. 2008; 246: 376-383
- Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography.Eur Radiol. 2002; 12: 2679-2683
- AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview.Radiographics. 2004; 24: 1747-1760
- Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - clinical results.Rofo. 2002; 174: 696-699
- Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography.Radiol Clin North Am. 2007; 45 (vi): 813-830
- Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203: 909-916
- Digital mammography: current capabilities and obstacles.J Am Coll Radiol. 2005; 2: 759-767
- Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.Radiology. 2014; 272: 52-62
- Screening outcome and surgical treatment during and after the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands.Int J Cancer. 2015; 137: 135-143
Available at: http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170112094139/http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/DocumentArchives/ucm199497.htm#dec. Accessed December 10, 2018.
- Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration.Eur Radiol. 2013; 23: 2061-2071
- Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.JAMA. 2014; 311: 2499-2507
- Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis and digital mammography in dense and nondense breasts.JAMA. 2016; 315: 1784-1786
- Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 716-726
- Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.JAMA. 2015; 314: 1599-1614
- Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 164: 659-666
- Effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography: outcomes analysis from 3 years of breast cancer screening.JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2: 737-743
Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM8874.pdf Accessed December 10, 2018.
- Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations.Radiology. 2014; 270: 49-56
- Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.Breast. 2015; 24: 93-99
- Comparison between digital and synthetic 2D mammograms in breast density interpretation.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 209: W36-W41
- Digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography versus digital mammography: evaluation in a population-based screening program.Radiology. 2018; 287: 787-794
- Strengths and weaknesses of synthetic mammography in screening.Radiographics. 2017; 37: 1913-1927
- Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.Radiology. 2015; 274: 654-662
Article info
Publication history
Published online: June 08, 2019
Footnotes
Disclosures: K.E. Conlon and L. Lester have nothing to disclose. S.M. Friedewald received a research grant and is a consultant for Hologic Inc.
Identification
Copyright
© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
